Competency Case Dilemma

Competency Case Dilemma ~ Introduction: Professional Competence EXPECTED: Week 5 highlights the importance of professional competence. Readings and assignments are focused on reflective integration of personal and professional practice, along with gained knowledge of existing competency research. Discussion Forum assignments challenge students to build upon readings and assignments from prior weeks in their examination of professional-competence issues and application of information in this area. The assignments probe for an in-depth understanding of personal, situational, ethical, and legal factors influencing competencies. ASSIGNMENT: The Week 5 written assignment challenges students to evaluate and apply their understanding of professional competence to a competency-based dilemma.n a 1,100- to 1,400-word (or 3- to 4-page) paper (excluding references and title page), discuss a competency-related scenario or a case of your choice, either from our readings or related to a situation that you have encountered in which you address the specific steps you would take to embrace ethical practices in your work. In what ways does the scenario you have selected present an ethical, legal, professional, or moral problem related to competency issues? In what way does your professional code of conduct offer possible solutions or opportunities for resolution? What are the implications of your ethical decision-making and actions for the client in this case, for those related to the client, and for you as a professional? In addition to the required readings, cite at least two additional references. Work: Employment Specialist; providing work for people whom have disabilities. HELPFUL READING: How does professional competence impact the provision of human services? McNamara (1975) defines professional competence as the delivery of quality services by use of professional knowledge, skills, and abilities. In the social services, basic levels of competence were created as a means to ensure no harm would come to clients by human service providers. In addition to harming clients, incompetence also harms the helping professions in general, as the public can lose trust in the field. Overholser and Fine (1990) describe five types of professional incompetence: * Incompetence Due to Lack of Knowledge * Incompetence Due to Inadequate Clinical Skills * Incompetence Due to Deficient Technical Skills (inability to use specialized assessment instruments, etc.) * Incompetence Due to Poor Judgment * Incompetence Due to Disturbing Interpersonal Attributes (personality characteristics, social skills, and emotional problems) Significant legal and ethical consequences can- and have- occurred as a result of human service professionals’ incompetency. Even well-meaning professionals can cause harm to clients as a result of practicing beyond their expertise. While practicing within the scope of one’s expertise may seem easy at first glance, there are questions to consider. For example: * How does a professional know he/she is not competent if there exist no standard assessments for competence beyond the requirements of licensure? * Does the professional possess the self-awareness necessary to acknowledge lack of expertise in a given area? * How does a new professional with no experience become competent unless he/she works in areas not known to him/her? * Is competency less of an issue for seasoned professionals when compared to professionals new to the field? For a thought-provoking read on this topic, consider the issues presented by Frederic Reamer in his article: The Limits of Professional Competence Most ethical codes describe options a practitioner can take when confronted with a case outside of the scope of his/her expertise. One possibility is to refer the client to a more appropriate provider. This occurs often in private practice because other options are limited. Another approach is to consult closely with an expert in the problem area while continuing to provide effective services to the client. In community-based settings, clinical supervisors often prefer to use the experience as an opportunity for professional growth. In these cases, the professional continues working with the client while the supervisor closely monitors the case and provides skilled advice. Continuing education can also assist in preventing competency-related ethical breaches. Many organizations have guidelines for the education and training of its employees. Most state licensing boards also require continuing education for license renewal. Of note, professional development is meant to be a life-long activity. Competence at the beginning of one’s career does not equate to a lifetime of competence. As Corey, Schneider-Corey and Callanan (2007) state: We also see the development of competence as an ongoing process, not a goal that counselors can ever finally attain. The process involves a willingness to continually question whether you are doing your work as well as you might and to search for ways of becoming a more effective person and therapist. (p. 360)