Critically evaluate whether the following can be said to illustrate Dubnick’s preferred notion of accountability or that of Habermas or that of Mulgan or that of Philp or that of Bovens

Critically evaluate whether the following can be said to illustrate Dubnick’s preferred notion of accountability or that of Habermas or that of Mulgan or that of Philp or that of Bovens.

Critically evaluate whether the following can be said to illustrate Dubnick’s preferred notion of accountability or that of Habermas or that of Mulgan or that of Philp or that of Bovens:

2014 testimony of Kevin Rudd before the Royal Commission into the Home Insulation Program

2014 testimony of Peter Garrett before the Royal Commission into the Home Insulation Program

< pstyle=" margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;">

< pstyle=" margin-bottom: 0cm; ">

< pstyle=" margin-left: 54pt; text-indent: -18pt;">

< pstyle=" margin-bottom: 13pt;">

Allan Hawke, April 2010, Review of the Administration of the Home Insulation Program http://www.ee.ret.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/04_2013/home-insulation-hawke-report-pdf.pdf

Senate Environment, Communications and the Arts References Committee, July 2010, Energy Efficient Homes Package http://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/senate/committee/eca_ctte/eehp/report/report.pdf

Australian National Audit Office, Report No. 12, 2010-2011 Home Insulation Program http://www.anao.gov.au/~/media/Uploads/Documents/2010%2011_audit_report_no_12.pdf

Word limit: 3000 words

Due Date: 3 September

Weight: 35%

—————————————————————————–

< pstyle=" margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;">

< pstyle=" margin-bottom: 0cm; ">

< pstyle=" margin-left: 54pt; text-indent: -18pt;">

< pstyle=" margin-bottom: 13pt;">

Click here to have a similar paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discountedDear All,

Reminder: Assignment 1 is due Wednesday, 3 September, 23:59 pm

Objective: demonstrate your mastery of the 5 theoretical approaches (Habermas; Dubnick; Mulgan; Philp; Bovens) by analysing the 5 readings (Garrett; Rudd; Allan Hawke’s Review; Senate Reference Committee Report/July 2010; ANAO Report No. 12) in light of the theories and presenting an argument about which theoretical approach(es ) underpin/can be found in those reaings
NOTE: a particular theory may be found in more than one of the readings; and any particular reading may illustrate more than one of the theories.

DO NOT provide a summary of the HIP events or provide other research that canvasses which of the 5 views is your or ‘the’ preferred view. Such a summary/further research
–will waste valuable words
–will suggest that you are avoiding demonstrating your mastery of the theories or demonstrating
your mastery of the capacity to apply the theories to contemporary documents not contemplated by any of the theorists

Note: You are welcome to indicate your preferred theory & why you prefer it but this is not required by the assignment.

< pstyle=" margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;">

< pstyle=" margin-bottom: 0cm; ">

< pstyle=" margin-left: 54pt; text-indent: -18pt;">

< pstyle=" margin-bottom: 13pt;">

Critically evaluate whether the following can be said to illustrate Dubnick’s preferred notion of accountability or that of Habermas or that of Mulgan or that of Philp or that of Bovens

Posted in Uncategorized