There are two person post and I need to reply both of them. i have to reply their post on discussion board. please send me an answer separately like,
what you like, dislike, agree, disagree or what you want to add more about that topic etc. based on their discussion board question answer.
Reply for person 1………..
Reply for person 2…….
Minimum Requirements: Your post length should be between 250-400 words and each reply to a peer should be 200-300 words. All post should reflect critical thinking, and quality writing – be polite and respectful in all posts.
1st person post
Question: After reading Chapter 10, how could non or quasi experimental designs be used today? You may pick the industry and the concept needs to be relevant (but may be hypothetical).
The prefix quasi signifies “looking like.” Thus quasi-experimental research will be investigating that takes after experiments inquire about however isn’t correct trial examination. In spite of the fact that the autonomous variable is controlled, members are not haphazardly doled out to conditions or requests of conditions. Since the autonomous variable is controlled before the needy variable is estimated, quasi-experiments inquires about takes out the directionality issue. But since members are not haphazardly allocated making it likely that there are different contrasts between conditions quasi exploratory research doesn’t dispose of the issue of perplexing factors. As far as inside legitimacy, along these lines, quasi-experiments are for the most part somewhere close to related studies and genuine examinations. Quasi-experiments are well on the way to be led in field settings in which arbitrary task is troublesome or unimaginable. They are regularly led to assess the adequacy of treatment may be a kind of psychotherapy or an instructive mediation.
Research can likewise be nonexperimental on the grounds that it centers around a factual connection between two factors however does exclude the control of an autonomous variable, the arbitrary task of members to conditions or requests of conditions, or both. This sort of research takes two essential structures: connection look into and quasi-experimental examination. In, the specialist quantifies the two factors of enthusiasm with practically no endeavor to control superfluous factors and afterward surveys the connection between them. An examination strategy understudy who sees if every one of a few center school understudies have been tormented and afterward gauges every understudy’s confidence is directing relationship inquire about. In, the analyst controls a free factor however doesn’t arbitrarily allocate members to conditions or requests of conditions. For instance, a specialist may begin an enemy of tormenting program (a sort of treatment) at one school and look at the rate of harassing at that school with the frequency at a comparable school that has no enemy of tormenting program.
2nd person Post
Question : After reading Chapter 10, how could non or quasi experimental designs be used today? You may pick the industry and the concept needs to be relevant (but may be hypothetical).
Quasi-experimental is a research that resembles experimental research but is not truly experimental. It is an empirical study used to estimate the causal impact of an intervention on its target population. Experimental research provides strong evidence but quasi-experimental wonâ€™t, this does not mean quasi-experimental research is not important. This type of non-experimental study encompasses a broad range of nonrandomized intervention studies (Harris et al., 2006) where it lacks the independent variable manipulation, random assignment of participants to conditions or orders of conditions, or both. Quasi-experiments are most likely to be conducted in field settings in which random assignment is difficult or impossible (Chiang & Price, 2015) and when the researcher does not have a particular research question or speculation about a causal connection between two factors. Similar to randomized trials, quasi-experiments aim to demonstrate causality between an intervention and an outcome (Harris et al., 2006).
For instance, researchers want to see the relationship between Coronavirus infection and the human bodyâ€™s immune system. The first thing that is likely to occur is to obtain a sample of people we have been tested positive for Coronavirus. But this would be a single-variable study with immunity as the only variable. Although it would tell the researchers something about the immunity of people who have been infected, it would not tell them what they really want to know, which is how immunity of the patients who have been tested positive compares with the immunity who have not infected. With this type of non-experimental research, the researcher would not know whether the patientâ€™s immune system ever went down, whether it remained the same or increased. To find out exactly, their sample would also have to include the group of people who have not been infected and those who got recovered from the infection. Thus, if the efficacy of the intervention has not been established, a randomized controlled trial is the design of choice to determine efficacy.
Chiang, I.-C. A., Jhangiani, R. S., & Price, P. C. (2015, October 13). Quasi-Experimental Research. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods/chapter/quas…
Harris, A. D., McGregor, J. C., Perencevich, E. N., Furuno, J. P., Zhu, J., Peterson, D. E., & Finkelstein, J. (2006). The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13801…