Psychology Evaluating Interview Strategies Project description Forensic interviews are conducted for a variety of purposes. The strategy used by the interviewer differs depending on the interviewee and nature of the investigation. Three of the most common strategies are the cognitive interview, the use of hypnosis, and the use of a polygraph. Each one of these strategies has different strengths and weaknesses. Forensic interviewers need to understand the unique contribution that each strategy can make to the overall goal of eliciting truthful information from an interviewee. In this Application Assignment, you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the cognitive interview, hypnosis, and the polygraph. You respond to questions about their applications, assumptions, effectiveness, and possible impact on a legal investigation. To prepare for this Application Assignment: Read the chapters in Gordon & Fleischer. Read the articles by Geiselman et al. and Wagstaff. Submit a paper of between four pages that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the three interview strategies described in the Learning Resources. Be sure to address the following questions in your analysis: In which situations are the three interview strategies most and least effective? Are certain interview strategies more effective with particular types of interviewees (suspects, witnesses, victims)? Justify your response. Do any of the strategies feel more œaccusatory than others? If so, what effect could this have on the quality of information obtained from the interviewee? Support your responses by citing the Learning Resources. Gordon, N. J., & Fleisher, W. L. (2011). Effective interviewing and interrogation techniques. London, England: Elsevier Ltd. (Academic Press). Chapter 4, œPreparation for the Interview/Interrogation (pp. 27“36) Chapter 21, œThe Instrumental Detection of Deception: Polygraph (pp. 297“312)

Posted in Uncategorized