read the attached journal and write reflection about it.
when you write the reflection follow these steps:
1.What are goals/purposes of the paper?
2.How did the authors go about achieving these goals (analysis, experiment, computation, etc.)?
3.What did they conclude?
4.Specific strengths (3) â€“ Well written, good technically, etc.
5.Specific weaknesses (3) â€“ Hardto read plots, errors, etc.
6.Overall assessment of quality of pap
I attached the artical file and picture that shows the steps.