reflective paper 32

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source

Introduction
You began this session considering a moral-ethical dilemma you yourself faced that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.

Instructions
Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following:

  • A written reflection
  • An oral presentation using VoiceThread or a PowerPoint narrated slide show. If you choose to do a VoiceThread, be sure to submit the link to the VoiceThread and make it so the instructor is authorized to view it. If you need help in doing so, please call the Chamberlain help desk for aid.

For the written reflection, revisit your ethical memoir and address the following:

  • What ethical theory best applies to your experience? The good and the evil
  • Which significant author you have studied most speaks to your own ethical paradigm as you are (re)forming it now?
  • If you did not resolve your ethical dilemma when you experienced it, what would you do now and why?

For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your memoire and explore your process of transformation in this course.

  • Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions and groups.
  • Are we a society of learners who greatly benefit from interactions?
  • Or are we islands, whose individual systems and beliefs are exclusive to ourselves?

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 1 scholarly source)

Presentation Requirements

  • Length: 2-3 minutes

Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Ethical Reflection Grading Rubric.

Weekly Objectives (WO)
WO2, 2.6, 7.2


Rubric

Ethical Reflection Grading Rubric – 75 pts

Ethical Reflection Grading Rubric – 75 pts

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

5.0 pts

Outstanding

Meets length requirement

0.0 pts

No Effort

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10.0 pts

Outstanding

Addresses all aspects of the assignment.

8.5 pts

Above Average

Addresses most aspects of the assignment.

7.5 pts

Average

Addresses some aspects of the assignment.

6.0 pts

Below Average

Addresses few aspects of the assignment.

0.0pts

No Effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

15.0 pts

Outstanding

Throughout the whole work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.

12.75 pts

Above Average

Throughout most of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.

11.25 pts

Average

Throughout some of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.

6.0 pts

Below Average

Throughout little of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.

0.0pts

No Effort

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection

15.0 pts

Outstanding

Clearly articulates several connections between the course concepts and life experiences and conducts insightful examination of course experience with several clear examples and support.

12.75 pts

Above Average

Articulates some connections between the course concepts and life and conducts some examination of the course experience with several clear examples and support.

11.25 pts

Average

Articulates some connections between the course concepts and life experiences and conducts some examination of the course experience but examination could be refined and more in depth.

6.0 pts

Below Average

Presents unclear connection between the course concepts and life experiences and conducts little examination of the course experience.

0.0pts

No Effort

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Concepts

10.0 pts

Outstanding

Ideas are logically organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, that come together in complete concepts.

8.5 pts

Above Average

Ideas are well organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, with complete concepts.

7.5 pts

Average

Organization and concepts need some restructuring.

6.0 pts

Below Average

Organization and concepts are difficult to follow and incomplete.

0.0pts

No Effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting / Presentation

10.0 pts

Outstanding

Throughout the whole work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).

8.5 pts

Above Average

Throughout most of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).

7.5 pts

Average

Throughout some of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).

6.0 pts

Below Average

Throughout little of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).

0.0pts

No Effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting

10.0 pts

Outstanding

Throughout the whole work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).

8.5 pts

Above Average

Throughout most of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).

7.5 pts

Average

Throughout some of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).

6.0 pts

Below Average

Throughout little of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).

0.0pts

No Effort

10.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0