Sinners in the Angry Hands of God

Sinners in the Angry Hands of God.

 Description When speakers give persuasive speeches, they utilize a variety of appeals and rhetorical devices to convey messages to their audiences and achieve their ultimate purposes. Write a 2-page essay in which you analyze the rhetorical devices the speaker uses in Sinners in the Angry Hands of God, to persuade his audience and achieve his purpose. The essay must be in 12-point font, Times New Roman font and be in proper APA format. Choose at least three rhetorical devices (literary elements) that make the work appealing and effectively contribute to the author’s purpose. Then write a thesis statement that identifies the devices and your opinion about their contribution to the work. Support your thesis statement with precise and relevant examples from the text of the speech. Use direct quotations, paraphrases, and summaries of the text to support the ideas in your analysis. Be sure to use parenthetical documentation to give credit to the author if citing from the text (see example below). If using a quote that is longer than three lines, use ellipses (…) to denote missing words, but you must never begin a quote with ellipses. Never drop naked quotes into your essay – you need to introduce your evidence with a transitional/ lead-in sentence (see example below). Example: Patrick Henry began his speech with a respectful tone that was meant to flatter the men present and make them feel as if he were one of them. His opening statement to the House, “Mr. President: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as well as the abilities of the very men who have just addressed the House” (Allen & Holt McDougal, 2012), was an ethical appeal to get the audience to trust him and feel a sense of brotherhood with him because he claimed to respect them and support their patriotic ideals. OR Example: Patrick Henry began his speech with a respectful tone that was meant to flatter the men present and make them feel as if he were one of them. His opening statement to the House, “Mr. President: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as well as the abilities of the very men who have just addressed the House” (Allen & Holt McDougal, 2012, p.122), was an ethical appeal to get the audience to trust him and feel a sense of brotherhood with him because he claimed to respect them and support their patriotic ideals. References page format: References Allen, J., & Holt McDougal. (2012). Holt McDougal Literature: Grade 11. Orlando, Fla: Holt McDougal/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Provide commentary for each example you draw from the text. The commentary should explain how the device effectively contributes to the overall purpose of the speech. The ratio is generally two commentaries for each detail. Do not just string one quote after another. You need to weave your commentary and your details together so that your essay flows smoothly from one idea to the next. Since this essay involves more than one example of more than one rhetorical device, the organization is of utmost importance. Organize paragraphs about devices used by order of importance and organize details and examples within each paragraph chronologically (the order in which they appear). Your conclusion should restate your main points and be insightful, but it must not be a repeat of your introduction. Avoid using the very same words you already used.

Sinners in the Angry Hands of God