Read the Union Carbide Corporation and Bhopal case. In lieu of answering the questions that follow the case, you will respond to the prompt below;
Consider the concerns as described in this case and prepare a memorandum that addresses the concerns described below. Your memo should be completed in narrative form.
Identify all of the potential ethical issues you see (if any). Describe and analyze the implications of each issue, including who or what were affected by the companyâ€™s response. In identifying issues and addressing their implications, your discussion should be as comprehensive as possibleâ€”you should consider any economic, social, or ecological implications.
Additionally, your analysis should thoroughly identify and discuss at least two potential courses of action that the company could have taken with respect to each issue you have discussed. Clearly demonstrate your reasoning processâ€”identify and explain any ethical principles or arguments you are relying on; do not simply state unsupported conclusions.
If you apply any approaches to ethical reasoning that you learned about in this course, clearly state what they are and how you are applying them to this case. Of the possible solutions you identified, which would you recommend that the company should have adopted as a resolution? Again, fully explain and justify your recommendations. Finally, explain how you would implement each solution you have recommended.
Use A Framework for Ethical Decision Making or the Eight Steps to Ethical Decision Making as a guide.
5-6 pages (double spaced).