Wright mills ˜sociological imagination ˜

Wright mills ˜sociological imagination ˜

Wright mills ˜sociological imagination ˜Wright mills described the concept of ˜sociological imagination ˜. What dose this mean ? 2)discuss a specific current event in light of the sociological imagination and propose, briefly, a way to study that issue, that takes into consideration the research design , limitation of the study, and ethical concern.

The sociological imagination is the practice of being able to “think ourselves away” from the familiar routines of our daily lives to look at them with fresh, critical eyes.

The sociological imagination is the ability to see things socially and how they interact and influence each other. To have a sociological imagination, a person must be able to pull away from the situation and think from an alternative point of view. This ability is central to one’s development of a sociological perspective on the world.

In The Sociological Imagination, published in 1959, Mills’ goal was to try to reconcile two different and abstract concepts of social reality—the “individual” and “society.”

In doing so, Mills challenged the dominant ideas within sociology and critiqued some of the most basic terms and definitions.
While Mills’s work was not well received at the time as a result of his professional and personal reputation—he had a combative personality—The Sociological Imagination is today one of the most widely read sociology books and is a staple of undergraduate sociology courses across the United States.
Mills opens with a critique of then-current trends in sociology, then goes on to explain sociology as he sees it: a necessary political and historical profession.
The focus of his critique was the fact that academic sociologists at that time often played a role in supporting elitist attitudes and ideas, and in reproducing an unjust status quo.
Connected to these ideas, Mills emphasized the importance of seeing the connections between social structure and individual experience and agency.

One way one can think about this, he offered, is to recognize that what we often experience as “personal troubles,” like not having enough money to pay our bills, are actually “public issues”—the result of social problems that course through society and affect many, like systemic economic inequality and structural poverty.

Mills recommended avoiding strict adherence to any one methodology or theory, because practicing sociology in such a way can and often does produce biased results and recommendations.

He also urged social scientists to work within the field of social science as a whole rather than specializing heavily in sociology, political science, economics, psychology, etc.

While Mills’ ideas were revolutionary and upsetting to many within sociology at the time, today they form the bedrock of sociological practice.